Category Archives: Tinfoil Hat

dream education memory mind psychology Tinfoil Hat war world

Michael Eisner presents alien abductions

Share

“In [Februaryi and] March of 1995, the UPN aired a most intriguing Disney-produced television special about UFOs, entitled ‘Alien Encounters from New Tomorrowland,’ writes the ForbiddenKnowledgeTV.com website. “This highly unusual broadcast presents UFOs and alien visitation to our planet as a matter of fact.” 1

“The Disney company aired a major one-hour television Special, with no advance notice, on stations in only 5 US cities. Thanks to a few viewers who were able to roll their VCRs and capture it, we have a record of the startling quotes and statements it contained,” adds the UFOevidence.org website.2

Ronald Reagan on aliens

Matt Staggs writes for disinfo.com website: “It’s a worthwhile curiosity if for nothing else than to watch Michael Eisner utter this awkwardly structured phrase”:

“In a top secret military installation somewhere in the United States, there are those who believe that the government is hiding the remains of an alien spacecraft that mysteriously crashed to Earth.” 3

“Robert Urich, the legendary Jim Street in ‘S.W.A.T.’, is the host of this voyage around the UFO’s and its mystery,” the Internet Movie Database chronicles further. “From New Tomorrowland, in Disneyland, Urich talks about UFO, contacts, evidences of its arrives, abductions, military documents and other things what surround this controversial thematic.” 4

“Many in the UFO research field felt that Disney’s Alien Encounters documentary was an effort by the powers that be to prepare us for Disclosure – a subtle test of public reaction to an official declaration that we are not alone,” writes Robbie Graham for the Silver Screen Saucers blog. “But in the sixteen years since the documentary was produced, not one UFO researcher has attempted to contact the film’s writer and director, Andrew Thomas, in order to learn the truth of the matter. So, in February 2011, [Graham] decided to do just that”:

There were aspects of the Alien Encounters project, however, that even Thomas considered strange – not least of all was the fact that Disney CEO Michael Eisner took a direct interest in the documentary, personally vetting its content and even filming his own introduction for the piece:

“I thought it was really odd because to me this was kind of a minor marketing project, but they [Disney] put a lot of weight into it. I mean Eisner doesn’t have to stop walking down the street to pick up a twenty-dollar-bill – it’s not worth his time. But they had him look through this. And he filmed this intro to the show. I didn’t do that. He had his own film crew take him out to a sound stage and film his own intro, which I thought was just really surprising.”

Also surprising to Thomas was Disney’s inexplicable TV scheduling for the documentary, which he described as “completely counter-intuitive,” because “it played on independent stations in the afternoon at like 2 o’clock or 3 o’ clock, or some horrible time when no one would be watching it.…

NASA UFO accounts

Regarding Close Encounters, Thomas explained that marketing executives at Columbia Pictures were concerned that Spielberg’s chosen title for the film made it sound “suspiciously like a pornographic movie, because no one had any reference to what that vocabulary meant.” This was where Thomas came in:

“Eighteen months before the film [Close Encounters] was going to premiere… before we’d even sold it to audiences, we had a campaign to introduce that vocabulary and make it part of the vernacular, so when the film opened-up everyone would know what was being discussed, and there wouldn’t be any question. So what I did was I worked with a planetarium to create a planetarium show that was about twenty-minutes long… you sit down and a UFO shoots across the planetarium dome and then the audience is trained on how to figure out whether that was a meteor, a comet, or actually an extraterrestrial. We managed to bus-in tens-of thousands of kids from all around the country on the pretence of seeing an educational planetarium show, but what they really got was a sophisticated message to explain to them that extraterrestrials and UFOs are real and what an encounter of the first, second and third kind actually meant.” 5


Notes

i The documentary was aired in only a handful of US cities at seemingly random times on selected dates in February and March, 1995, with no advance notice – a rather odd marketing strategy considering its purpose was to promote a major theme park ride for families.… The ride itself seemed like an afterthought.*
– Robbie Graham Silver Screen Saucers), “UFOs and Disney: Behind the Magic Kingdom,” UFO Encounters Live, 2011, at http://ufoencounterslive.com/ufonews_ufo_disney.htm (retrieved: 23 March 2013).

* The War of the Worlds (October 30, 1938), The Mercury Theatre on the Air, at http://www.mercurytheatre.info, MP3 at http://sounds.mercurytheatre.info/mercury/381030.mp3 (retrieved: 3 January 2011).

Related links

1 “Disney’s ‘Alien Encounters from New Tomorrowland’ (1995),” forbiddenknowledgetv.com, 19 October 2011, at http://www.forbiddenknowledgetv.com/videos/ufosinterdimensionalultraterrestrials/disneys-alien-encounters-from-new-tomorrowland-1995.html (retrieved: 22 March 2013).

2 “Disney’s Legendary ‘Alien Encounters’ Sneak TV Documentary Quotes”, UFOevidence.org, at http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc811.htm (retrieved: 22 March 2013).

3 Matt Staggs, “Walt Disney’s ‘Alien Encounters from New Tomorrowland’,” disinformation, 8 February 2013, at http://www.disinfo.com/2013/02/walt-disneys-alien-encounters-from-new-tomorrowland/ (retrieved: 22 March 2013).

4 Alien Encounters from New Tomorrowland, IMDb, at http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0235174/plotsummary (retrieved: 22 March 2013).

5 Robbie Graham Silver Screen Saucers), “UFOs and Disney: Behind the Magic Kingdom,” UFO Encounters Live, 2011, at http://ufoencounterslive.com/ufonews_ufo_disney.htm (retrieved: 23 March 2013).

See also

Kevin J. Crosby, “Mickey Finn,” Tinfoil Hat, at http://skewsme.com/tinfoilhat/chapter/mickey-finn/ (retrieved: 22 March 2013).

MADONNA COL BAMBINO E SAN GIOVANNINO
(Madonna and Child with the Infant Saint John)
Attributed to Sebastiano Mainardi or Jacopo del Sellaio
(Firenze, Palazzo Vecchio Museum, Sala d’Ercole)

Share
memory mind psychology Tinfoil Hat war

Tinfoil Hat – introduction

Share

See here for full text.

Reading through email spam or the classified advertisements in a progressive newspaper, one may find offers for everything from assertiveness training1 to sexual domination hypnosis2 to computer software designed to flash brief messages on the screen with the goal of quitting smoking or losing weight.3 These are just a few of the many household Mind Control products marketed today promising that their simple tricks will allow anyone to be the master of their domain. While the efficacy of these programs is debatable, the science behind them is very real.

The basics of Mind Control are as ancient as mankind itself. Convincing someone to adopt an idea or perform a task is commonplace in every family. As a result, children begin learning skills of persuasion at an early age. Kids may rationalize, peer pressure, beg, bribe, bully, guilt, or resort to any number of other tactics including blackmail and all out violent assault in order to get their way. An increasing number of teens and young adults are starting to hone these skills in order to control family, friends and coworkers.

“Flicking through some of the saner sections of neuro-linguistic programming texts (minus the new age content) brings up the subtle use of language and body-language to influence other people,” states United Kingdom Defense Contractor “Mom” in personal correspondence. One method of this technique is through “mirroring” 4 the actions and words of the other person, which Mom explains:

Mirroring fosters a sense of ease or trust. Courting couples tend to do this intuitively (watch dating couples and see how they mirror things like sipping coffee, taking a bite of food, etc.) but it can be used as a way of making the mirrored party susceptible to persuasion. By doing the opposite to mirroring, the other party can be made ill-at-ease and be less amenable to persuasion (basically it rubs them up the wrong way).

Mom points out entertainer Derren Brown5 whose website reveals that he “can seemingly predict and control human behavior. He doesn’t claim to be a mind-reader, instead he describes his craft as a mixture of magic, suggestion, psychology, misdirection and showmanship.” Brown “primes” his audience members using subtle clues to respond in predetermined ways. The effect is dramatic.

Mom also notes a Mind Control game that primes players based upon their personality: conformists will end up visualizing one image (e.g., an elephant in Denmark) while nonconformists will see another (e.g., an emu in Dubai). This phenomenon may be found in simpler form per a circulating email that has the reader calculate the number six several times then asks for a vegetable. It claims 98% of readers will choose carrot.

A documentary at the YouTube.com website, “The CFR Controlled Media Cabal (Part 3),” reports:

The human mind is like a computer no matter how efficient it may be. It’s reliability is only as great as the information fed into it. If it is possible to control the input of the human mind, then no matter how intelligent a person may be, it’s entirely possible to program what he will think; and yes, it’s even possible to program people to laugh at the mere mention of the word “conspiracy.” 6, i

Notes

i A conspiracy may be a continuing one; actors may drop out and others may drop in; the details of operation may change from time to time; the members need not know each other or the part played by others; a member may not need to know all the details of the plan of the operation; he must, however, know the purpose of the conspiracy and agree to become a party to a plan to effectuate that purpose.
– cited from the Californiia Court of Appeals decision, Craig v. U.S. C.C.A. Cal. 81 F2d 816, 822.

Related links

1 Assertiveness Training Websites, SelfGrowth.com: The Online Self Improvement Community, at http://www.selfgrowth.com/assert.html (retrieved: 3 January 2011).

2 Sexual Domination Hypnosis, Google search, at http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=sexual+domination+hypnosis (retrieved: 3 January 2011).

3 Subliminal Software – Subliminal Messages & Self Hypnosis Software!, Subliminal-Power.com, at http://www.subliminal-power.com/mind/ (retrieved: 3 January 2011).

4 Mirroring (psychology), Wikipedia.org, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirroring_(psychology) (retrieved: 3 January 2011).

5 Derren Brown, at http://www.derrenbrown.co.uk/ (retrieved: quoted March 2006; 3 January 2011).

6 “[CFR]:Media Controlled and Manipulated by Corporate (3 of 3),” MarkNg07 video at YouTube.com, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3eHjy-Ameo (retrieved: 5 January 2011). (Watch it here)

Related videos

“Derren Brown – Subliminal Advertising,” thaflash1988 video at YouTube.com, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZyQjr1YL0zg (retrieved: 4 January 2011). (Embedding disabled)

“Derren Brown NLP,” Neuro-linguist programming, jresester video at YouTube.com, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=befugtgikMg (retrieved: 27 April 2011). (Embedding disabled)

“[CFR]:Media Controlled and Manipulated by Corporate (3 of 3),” MarkNg07 video at YouTube.com, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3eHjy-Ameo (retrieved: 5 January 2011). (Watch it here)


Share
memory mind psychology Tinfoil Hat war world

Tinfoil Hat – Voice to Skull (V2K)

Share

Voice to Skull (V2K)

See here for full text.

“The Voice of God weapon – a device that projects voices into your head to make you think God is speaking to you – is the military’s equivalent of an urban myth,” writes Wired Magazine. “Meaning, it’s mentioned periodically at defense workshops,… and typically someone whispers about it actually being used.” 1

“The microwave auditory effect, also known as the microwave hearing effect or the Frey effect, consists of audible clicks induced by pulsed/modulated microwave frequencies,” reports Wikipedia. James C. Linn notes that “Frey found that human subjects exposed to 1310 MHz and 2982 MHz microwaves at average power densities of 0.4 to 2 mW/cm2 perceived auditory sensations described as buzzing or knocking sounds. The sensation occurred instantaneously at average incident power densities well below that necessary for known biological damage and appeared to originate from within or near the back of the head.” 2

Wikipedia continues:

The clicks are generated directly inide the human head without the need of any receiving electronic device. The effect was first reported by persons working in the vicinity of radar transponders during World War II. These induced sounds are not audible to other people nearby.… The existence of non-lethal weaponry that exploits the microwave auditory effect appears to have been classified ‘Secret NOFORN’ in the USA from (at the latest) 1998, until the declassification on 6 December 2006 of “Bioeffects of Selected Non-Lethal Weaponry” in response to a FOIA request.3

The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request (refer to case #614F-06) was made “for all documents pertaining to the microwave auditory effect, microwave hearing effect, Frey effect, artificial telepathy, and/or any device/weapon which uses and/or causes such effect; and any covert or undisclosed use of hypnosis.” Possible influence on subject(s) notes that “microwave hearing may be useful to provide a disruptive condition to a person not aware of the technology. Not only might it be disruptive to the sense of hearing, it could be psychologically devastating if one suddenly heard “voices within one’s head”. 4

Until 2008 when the entry was abruptly deleted, the online U.S. Army Thesaurus reported of “voice to skull technology” that defined the term as a:

Nonlethal weapon which includes (1) a neuro-electromagnetic device which uses microwave transmission of sound into the skull of persons or animals by way of pulse-modulated microwave radiation; and (2) a silent sound device which can transmit sound into the skull of person or animals. NOTE: The sound modulation may be voice or audio subliminal messages. One application of V2K is use as an electronic scarecrow to frighten birds in the vicinity of airports.5

“Birds seem to be highly sensitive to microwave audio,” says Lev Sadovnik of the Sierra Nevada Corporation in the US working on a device “dubbed MEDUSA (Mob Excess Deterrent Using Silent Audio) [which] exploits the microwave audio effect, in which short microwave pulses rapidly heat tissue, causing a shockwave inside the skull that can be detected by the ears. A series of pulses can be transmitted to produce recognisable sounds.” The article in New Scientist continues:

MEDUSA involves a microwave auditory effect “loud” enough to cause discomfort or even incapacitation. Sadovnik says that normal audio safety limits do not apply since the sound does not enter through the eardrums.… He has carried out his own work on the technique, and was even approached by the music industry about using microwave audio to enhance sound systems, he told New Scientist.

“But is it going to be possible at the power levels necessary?” he asks. Previous microwave audio tests involved very “quiet” sounds that were hard to hear, a high-power system would mean much more powerful – and potentially hazardous – shockwaves.6

Non-microwave equivalents have also been invented that utilize frequency modulation of highly directional ultrasonic sound waves. “Holosonic Research Labs and American Technology Corporation both have versions of directed sound, which can allow a single person to hear a message that others around don’t hear,” continues Wired Magazine. “DARPA appears to be working on its own sonic projector.” 7

Nicholas Jones details electronic Mind Control at the Educate-Yourself.org website:

Subliminal words in the correct electromagnetic-field that expresses human consciousness, attuned to the human brain, can enter our minds at a subconscious level. Our brain activity patterns can apparently be measured and stored on computer by super-computers. If a victim needs subliminal-thoughts implanted, all that is necessary is to capture, save on computer, and target the person’s brainwave pattern to send them such low frequency subliminal-messages that they actually think it is their own thoughts.8

Writes Dick Sutphen in “The Battle for Your Mind: Brainwashing Techniques Being Used On The Public”:

There are also inaudible ELFs (extra-low frequency waves). These are electromagnetic in nature. One of the primary uses of ELFs is to communicate with our submarines.… Waves below 6 cycles per second caused the subjects to become very emotionally upset, and even disrupted bodily functions. At 8.2 cycles, they felt very high… an elevated feeling, as though they had been in masterful meditation, learned over a period of years. Eleven to 11.3 cycles induced waves of depressed agitation leading to riotous behavior.9

Related links

1 Sharon Weinberger, “The Voice of God Weapon Returns,” Wired Magazine, 21 December 2007, at http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2007/12/the-voice-of-go/ (retrieved: 6 January 2011).

2 Richard Alan Miller, “Synthetic Telepathy And…,” Presented at the Consciousness Technologies Conference, July 19-21, 2001, on Saturday, July 20th, 2001, in Sisters, Oregon, at http://richardalanmiller.com/ram/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=152%3Asynthetic-telepathy-and&catid=44%3Ascrollercontent&Itemid=185

3 “Microwave auditory effect,” Wikipedia.org, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwave_auditory_effect (retrieved: 6 January 2011).

4 “Bioeffects of Selected Non-Lethal Weapons,” Christians Against Mental Slavery, at http://www.slavery.org.uk/Bioeffects_of_Selected_Non-Lethal_Weapons.pdf (retrieved: 6 January 2011).

5 “voice to skull devices,” U.S. Army Thesaurus, at http://call.army.mil/products//thesaur/00016275.htm (retrieved: circa 2008); See also: Sharon Weinberger, “Army Yanks ‘Voice-To-Skull Devices’ Site,” Wired Magazine, at http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2008/05/army-removes-pa/ (retrieved: 25 March 2011).

6 David Hambling, “Microwave ray gun controls crowds with noise,” New Scientist, 3 July 2008, http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14250 (retrieved: 24 May 2011).

7 Weinberger, “The Voice of God.”

8 Nicholas Jones, “Total Population Control,” 12 July 2002, educate-yourself.org, at http://educate-yourself.org/mc/mctotalcontrol12jul02.shtml (retrieved: 6 January 2011).

9 Dick Sutphen, “The Battle for Your Mind: Brainwashing Techniques Being Used On The Public,” Whale, at http://www.whale.to/w/mind.html (retrieved: 7 January 2011).

Related videos

“Woody Norris invents amazing things,” Ted: Ideas Worth Spreading, video at ted.com, http://www.ted.com/talks/woody_norris_invents_amazing_things.html (retrieved: 22 April 2011). (Watch it here)

“Mind Control,” simonxhayes video at YouTube.com, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7apZl_lt0A (retrieved: 9 June 2008). (Watch it here)


Share
Stop censorship