The Big Lie (German: Große Lüge) is a propaganda technique. The expression was coined by Adolf Hitler, when he dictated his 1925 book Mein Kampf, about the use of a lie so “colossal” that no one would believe that someone “could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously.” — Wikipedia
“In February 2003, a Florida Court of Appeals unanimously agreed with an assertion by FOX News that there is no rule against distorting or falsifying the news in the United States,” writes Mike Gaddy. The case was regarding:
a story about bovine growth hormone (BGH), a controversial substance manufactured by Monsanto
Corporation,…revealing that there were many health risks related to BGH and that Florida supermarket chains did little to avoid selling milk from cows treated with the hormone, despite assuring customers otherwise.…Fox executives and their attorneys wanted the reporters to use statements from Monsanto representatives that the reporters knew were false and to make other revisions to the story that were in direct conflict with the facts. Fox editors then tried to force [the reporters] to continue to produce the distorted story. When they refused and threatened to report Fox’s actions to the FCC, they were both fired. (Project Censored #12 1997)…
FOX appealed the case, and on February 14, 2003 the Florida Second District Court of
Appeals…[ruled that reporting] the station’s actions to the FCC did not deserve protection under Florida’s whistle blower statute, because Florida’s whistle blower law states that an employer must violate an adopted “law, rule, or regulation.” In a stunningly narrow interpretation of FCC rules, the Florida Appeals court claimed that the FCC policy against falsification of the news does not rise to the level of a “law, rule, or regulation,” it was simply a “policy.” Therefore, it is up to the station whether or not it wants to report honestly.1
FOX News map with Iraq mislabeled as Egypt
“A former Fox News
It’s clear that Fox News has become a misleading, partisan outlet. But here’s what the source stresses: Fox News is designed to mislead its viewers and designed to engage in a purely political enterprise.
In 2010, all sorts of evidence tumbled out to confirm that fact, like the recently leaked emails from inside Fox News, in which a top editor instructed his newsroom staffers (not just the opinion show hosts) to slant the news when reporting on key stories such as climate change and health care reform.
Meanwhile, Media Matters revealed that during the 2009-2010 election cycle, dozens of Fox News personalities endorsed, raised money, or campaigned for Republican candidates or organizations in more than 600 instances. And in terms of free TV airtime that Fox News handed over to GOP hopefuls, Media Matters calculated the channel essentially donated $55 million worth of airtime to Republican presidential hopefuls last year who also collect Fox News
|Real eyes realize real lies|
“Canadian regulators announced [in February 2011] they would reject efforts by Canada’s right-wing Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, to repeal a law that forbids lying on broadcast news,” writes Robert F. Kennedy Jr.:
Canada’s Radio Act requires that “a licenser may not
broadcast…any false or misleading news.” The provision has kept Fox News and right-wing talk radio out of Canada and helped make Canada a model for liberal democracy and freedom. As a result of that law, Canadians enjoy high quality news coverage, including the kind of foreign affairs and investigative journalism that flourished in this country before Ronald Reagan abolished the “Fairness Doctrine” in 1987.3
A Fairleigh Dickinson University poll conducted in October 2011 found that “Fox News viewers in the U.S. are less informed than those who watch nothing at all.” Dan Cassino, an assistant political science professor at Fairleigh Dickinson and analyst for the PublicMind, “blamed the network’s ideological bent for depriving its viewers of current events that would keep them informed of what is going on in the world and the United States.”
“Ideological media isn’t even getting the basic facts down, so it’s hard to understand what the function is,” Cassino said. “The profit motive really is killing a lot of these best news
1 Mike Gaddy, “The Media Can Legally Lie,” lewrockwell.com, at http://www.relfe.com/media_can_legally_lie.html (retrieved: 14 January 2012).
2 Eric Boehlert, “FOX NEWS INSIDER: ‘Stuff Is Just Made Up’,” Media Matters, 10 February 2011, at http://mediamatters.org/blog/201102100007 (retrieved: 14 January 2012).
3 Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., “Fox News’ Lies Keep Them Out of Canada,” Media With Conscience (MWC) News, 2 March 2011, at http://mwcnews.net/focus/politics/9037-fox-news-lies-keep-them-out-of-canada.html (retrieved: 14 January 2012).
4 Richard J. Brennan, “Fox News leaves viewers ignorant,” thestar.com, 22 November 2011, at http://www.thestar.com/news/article/1090791 (retrieved: 8 February 2012).
“Healthcare ruling: CNN and Fox News report wrong decision,” The Guardian, 28 June 2012, at http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/us-news-blog/2012/jun/28/healthcare-ruling-cnn-wrong-decision?newsfeed=true (retrieved: 28 June 2012).
“CNN and Fox News Botch Report on Supreme Court Health Care Mandate,” thefw.com, 28 June 2012, (retrieved: 28 June 2012).
foxnewslies.net (retrieved: 14 January 2012).
“Danish TV Uses Assassin’s Creed Screenshot To Illustrate Syrian Crisis,” Huffington Post UK, 11 March 2013, at http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/03/11/danish-tv-uses-assassins-creed-syria_n_2852558.html (retrieved: 13 April 2013).
“CNN Gets Supreme Court Ruling Wrong,” video at 5min.com, http://www.5min.com/Video/CNN-Gets-Supreme-Court-Ruling-Wrong-517406831 (retrieved: 28 June 2012). (
“Fox News Gets Supreme Court Ruling Wrong,” video at 5min.com, http://www.5min.com/Video/Fox-News-Gets-Supreme-Court-Ruling-Wrong-517406870 (retrieved: 28 June 2012). (
This page is subject to change as new facts arise.
This material contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. SkewsMe.com is making it available without profit to viewers who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of human rights, civil liberties, and social justice, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use,’ you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.